Another 80s action staple is on track to be rebooted. IESB is reporting that director Robert Rodriguez has announced plans to reboot the Arnold Schwarzenegger action film, Predator.
The director made the announcement at his Troublemaker Studios, where Texas politicians signed a reform bill to the state's film incentive program. Here's what the director said at the press conference.
"I'm going to be able to shoot my upcoming Machete here, a sci-fi action film called Nervewrackers, a re-boot of the Predator series called Predators, and a couple of smaller movies called Sin City 2 and The Jetsons."
The site also confirmed that Rodriguez was indeed directing and producing the Predators remake, and it will be his own take on the original concept.
We'll be sure to keep you posted on any news surrounding this remake.
Source
Showing posts with label reboot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reboot. Show all posts
Robert Rodriguez to Reboot Predator
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Labels:
jetsons,
machete,
nervewrackers,
predator,
reboot,
robert rodriguez,
sin city
'Alien' Remake, Reboot, Whatever - Just a Bad Idea
Monday, June 1, 2009
You've got to have a giant set of balls to remake Alien. In terms of genre movies, setting your sights on Alien is like remaking Snow White or Casablanca or Annie Hall. Alien really is that good and that important in its genre. So is the sequel. So maybe Fox recognizes that and is focusing instead on some kind of origin story. That's what Bloody Disgusting is reporting today.
I'm a little confused as to what an origin story would be, though. Would it concentrate on the evolution of the alien race? Would it be the crew of the Nostromo earlier in their mission? And if it's Option B, why the hell would you make that movie without the Alien, thus avoiding the remake tag? Or how could you make an Alien-free origin story without the intention of getting around to it someday? Could any of this sound like a worse idea?
The rumor is that Ridley and Tony Scott are locked in to produce and that it will be a journey of the Nostromo crew, meaning a new Ripley and a new Alien presence. So, if the sources are to be believed, this is a remake no matter what else they stack on top of it.
Who would direct? Not Ridley Scott. Not Tony Scott. Not anyone you've probably heard of, in fact. The name being linked to the project is Carl Rinsch, a commercial and music video director. There's a long history of filmmakers emerging from those fields, so it's not that I mind Rinsch getting called up to the big leagues, but I think I'd mind anybody remaking Alien.
Here's a solution for Fox, and see what you think about it: Just digitally restore and re-release Alien. Give it a healthy distribution in a 1,500 - 2,000 theaters. My precedent for this is The Exorcist, another movie that would not be enhanced through a remake. The director's cut was released in 2000 and made $40 million, opening in second place despite only playing in several hundred theaters.
Fox would please purists and introduce the film to new audiences as well, which is presumably the point of remaking it. And it would cost much, much less, bringing the studio and the producers a greater return on a movie that realistically can't be improved upon.
And then, six months later, do the same thing with Aliens.
SOURCE
I'm a little confused as to what an origin story would be, though. Would it concentrate on the evolution of the alien race? Would it be the crew of the Nostromo earlier in their mission? And if it's Option B, why the hell would you make that movie without the Alien, thus avoiding the remake tag? Or how could you make an Alien-free origin story without the intention of getting around to it someday? Could any of this sound like a worse idea?
The rumor is that Ridley and Tony Scott are locked in to produce and that it will be a journey of the Nostromo crew, meaning a new Ripley and a new Alien presence. So, if the sources are to be believed, this is a remake no matter what else they stack on top of it.
Who would direct? Not Ridley Scott. Not Tony Scott. Not anyone you've probably heard of, in fact. The name being linked to the project is Carl Rinsch, a commercial and music video director. There's a long history of filmmakers emerging from those fields, so it's not that I mind Rinsch getting called up to the big leagues, but I think I'd mind anybody remaking Alien.
Here's a solution for Fox, and see what you think about it: Just digitally restore and re-release Alien. Give it a healthy distribution in a 1,500 - 2,000 theaters. My precedent for this is The Exorcist, another movie that would not be enhanced through a remake. The director's cut was released in 2000 and made $40 million, opening in second place despite only playing in several hundred theaters.
Fox would please purists and introduce the film to new audiences as well, which is presumably the point of remaking it. And it would cost much, much less, bringing the studio and the producers a greater return on a movie that realistically can't be improved upon.
And then, six months later, do the same thing with Aliens.
SOURCE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)